Titre : | Integrating life cycle analysis into system dynamics: the case of steel in Europe : Intégration de l'analyse du cycle de vie dans la dynamique des systèmes: le cas de l'acier en Europe (2019) |
Auteurs : | Julian Pinto ; Harald Sverdrup ; Arnaud Diemer |
Type de document : | Article : Revues - Articles |
Dans : | Environmental Systems Research (Vol.8 N°1, 2019-12) |
Article en page(s) : | 21 p. |
Langues: | Anglais ; |
Catégories : |
[Eurovoc] ÉCONOMIE > politique économique > politique économique > économie circulaire [Eurovoc] GÉOGRAPHIE > Europe [Eurovoc] INDUSTRIE > métallurgie et sidérurgie > industrie sidérurgique > produit sidérurgique > acier [Eurovoc] SCIENCES > sciences naturelles et appliquées > sciences de la vie > écologie |
Tags : | steel ; europe ; system dynamics ; life cycle assessment ; industrial ecology ; circular economy |
Résumé : |
Background
Steel is an important material in modern economies but responsible, nevertheless, for substantial environmental impacts throughout its supply chain. During the last couple of decades, this industry has addressed its impacts more incisively with the support of modelling and assessment tools. Methodology This article used the European steel industry as a case study to explore the potential benefits of integrating life cycle analysis (LCA) into system dynamics (SD) under the scopes of circular economy and industrial ecology. The goal was to explore if this integration could not only reproduce results generated separately by LCA and SD, but also to provide additional support for decision- and policy-making on the biophysical aspects of long-term materials sourcing. Unlike previous studies focused on methodological exchanges between the two, the entire LCA methodology was brought into the SD modelling environment, following ILCD and ISO guidelines and standards. Results The results indicated that integrating LCA into SD is feasible and capable of contributing to both in different levels, supporting discussions on raw material scarcity and self-sufficiency, and resource ownership retention. Conclusion Given continued effort is put into supporting the use of environmental impact indicators, this approach has potential to interest policy-makers and industrial decision-makers alike. |
Doi : | DOI : 10.1186/s40068-019-0144-2 |
Axe de recherche : | Trajectoires de développement durable |
En ligne : | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02136420 |